SEO and SEM

June 09, 2011 - 6:50 GMT

Last week I had the pleasure of being interviewed by Scott Abel (@scottabel), the Content Wrangler himself, on the topic of search engine optimization, or SEO. The purpose of SEO is to drive targeted traffic to a website from search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo. It‘s a multi-faceted discipline that requires development of a strategy to ensure success and it’s important that activities like keyword research be integrated directly into content authoring processes.

Scott and I discussed key considerations for optimizing organic website visibility and we walked through an example of potential opportunity lost when a site fails to obtain a high ranking for a specific keyword. The webinar provided the more than 160 attendees with practical and useful information that can be used to kick start any SEO program. Feedback was great and many questions were asked including: 

Question: What are your thoughts on long-tail keyword searches?

May 12, 2011 - 12:56 GMT
Note: this article was originally published on CMWWire

In Information Overload and Improving Intranet Findability, we talked about overcoming challenges around our ability to filter through the copious amounts of data that we’re confronted with on a daily basis inside our organizations. Expanding on that topic, let’s now take a look at it from a much broader perspective, one that extends out beyond the firewall and into the digital realm of the Internet itself.  

In this day and age it’s easy to publish content online. Anyone can do it and the ease with which it can be done has resulted in a massive explosion of digital data, which some expect to surpass an estimated 988 EB (exabyte) this year. The sheer volume of information is inconceivable, let alone challenges encountered overcoming difficulties in our attempts to both find and be found online.

September 24, 2010 - 10:14 GMT

Last week, Seth Earley blogged about the inefficacy of social tagging, but there's one scenario in which social tagging will breathe new life into an esoteric, 200-year industry: book indexing.

I've written hundreds of book indexes, presided over the American Society for Indexing, managed an international indexing partnership, taught courses, established standards, built tools, and consulted with a lot of influential folks, so trust me when I tell you that it pains me to see this happening. I believe with every fiber of my professional being that the human work of subject indexing is and will continue to be superior in quality to every alternative ever imagined. Oh well.

There is just too much information to index by hand, period. Books, periodicals, websites, blogs, messages, and documents are being produced or transformed too quickly for humans to keep pace, regardless of training and tools. Perhaps in response, the use of search algorithms becomes ever more popular, while overly optimistic expectations of retrieval quality grows increasingly preposterous. A more realistic response would be an increase in subject indexers' fees -- after all, demand is outpacing supply at an astounding rate -- but indexers haven't experienced a rate increase since the 1990s. The truth is that editorial indexing and all smart hands-on tagging is disappearing in favor of automatic approximations. And it is a reasonable argument that the substandard tagging of millions of pages and documents is better than leaving most of them without any subject metadata whatsoever.

August 09, 2010 - 11:37 GMT

In this article (originally published via CMSWire) we examine the desire to duplicate the Google experience in the enterprise by attempting to change our perspective on what we expect from enterprise search based on what we’re willing to do to make it work. 

August 06, 2009 - 8:38 GMT

Much has been written on this blog about the value of SEO when it comes to taxonomies.  As Stephanie mentions its’ a huge weapon in the battle against outdated legacy terminology and spur of the second marketing speak. Jeff’s posts on keyword research, taxonomy and SEO are indispensable primers on the topic. So what haven’t we talked about yet?

How about SEO as the enemy of navigation? 

Is there such a problem as too much of a good thing? When it comes to taxonomy navigation best practices and SEO, you bet.  Think about it this way: imagine you are meeting a friend for drinks after work and she tells you a story about something that happened to her during the day. 

“I was in my office, and I had just poured myself a fresh cup of coffee.  I was in my office and the phone rang but I was tempted to ignore it. I was in my office and picked up the phone and it was my husband calling, did I mention I was in my office? Anyways I was in my office and my husband told me to sit down because he had incredible news. I was in my office and I sat down. I was in my office and my husband told me that we had just won the lottery?

Right, so... where were you again?  In your office, ok we get it!  

Now have a look at the following taxonomy navigation suggested to us on a project for SEO purposes:

February 14, 2009 - 9:35 GMT

My last few blog posts on keyword research tips have generated interest from our readers regarding the relationship between the SEO task of keyword research and taxonomy. The purpose of today’s post is to examine the intersection between the two and offer a little advice for reconciling the internal perspective of taxonomy with external internet search. We can harmonize these perspectives using a data-driven approach to understand the "mental model" of the external searcher.

December 22, 2008 - 3:21 GMT

In my last post I discussed a process for putting together a broad list of keywords intended to act as the starting point for our keyword research. The purpose of this step was to give us the ability to cast as wide a net as possible in an effort to uncover as much of the language being used by our potential customers when searching for our content, products and/or services online. Doing so not only gives us the opportunity to wisely target the correct keywords, but also lets us craft our content in such a way as to tap into as much into the long tail as possible. To illustrate, I’ll use the following Top Content report from Google Analytics. As you can see this particular page, although targeted toward a specific set of keywords, generated traffic from an amazing 5,766 unique keyword combinations! This alone demonstrates the power of the long tail in driving significant amounts of traffic to your website.

Tapping into the Long Tail og Search

Keep in mind that you don’t want to generate traffic just for traffic’s sake; you want these visitors to do something while on the site, whether it’s to buy your product, fill out a form or contact your company. Web analytics aside, now that we’ve done all the groundwork and assembled our master list of terms, we’re ready to tackle the research part of our keyword research.

August 21, 2008 - 5:30 GMT

Last week Stephanie wrote about (post) the importance of considering specific facets of search engine optimization in helping taxonomists guide clients in choosing the right keywords. To further that discussion, I thought I’d put together a series of posts to speak in more detail about using keyword research as a tool for determining (or at least being consciously aware of) the language being used by those searching for your content, products and/or services online.

Preparation - Creating Your Master List The first step in the process is the groundwork. I always allocate a certain amount of time up front to plan and prepare the list of initial keywords to be used as a basis for conducting keyword research. You need to have an inventory of words or phrases to get started, so why not put some thought and effort into generating a solid list to work from. From my perspective, the better the plan, the better the results. So let’s get to it.

August 14, 2008 - 4:59 GMT

In my last post, I mentioned the difficulty that some clients/stakeholders have in letting go of certain terminology when they undertake a taxonomy project:

Search engine optimization (SEO) has become one of the most important tools in helping us taxonomists get hard data that is meaningful and fight against the inclusion of terms that are too cute, ambiguous or otherwise detract from the findability of content.