All Posts

    Grapes & Chickens: Building the Models That Support Everything

    Since entering this profession (information management), I have been amused by the expression “comparing apples and oranges,” which is used to communicate a vast chasm of difference between two items. A typical use of this idiom includes “Comparing a train ride to riding a bicycle is ridiculous, an apples-and-oranges comparison.”

    Why am I so amused? Because apples and oranges are both fruit, that’s why. They are, absent any other influential context, essentially the same thing. They are grown in orchards, sold next to each other in stores, purchased for the same price, eaten raw, turned into juice, filled with natural sugar and seeds, and so on. I even use them when teaching basic taxonomy.

    The idiom is based on the idea that the distinctions between these two items is too strong to enable a reasonable comparison. For example, it would be unfair to measure the tartness or freshness of an apple using an “orange-based standard.” This is true, of course, but it is even harder to compare an apple with a hockey stick, a prime minister, an emotional outburst, or a philosophical approach to understanding the world.

    The is-ness of an item must be singularly defined, assigned, and understood when designing an information system to support it. An item’s is-ness defines how it must be modeled (its schema), which controls how it is described, Are webinars the same as documents? Are tweets like emails? Hammers like nails? Customers like each other? Until you are clear on how and why different items are different -- or the same -- you really shouldn’t be designing their containing knowledge systems.

    Here’s a joke my kids taught me. What’s the difference between a chicken and a grape? The answer: They’re both purple, except for the chicken.

    Modeling is at the core of every data-driven application, from the analysis of big data to the Internet of Things, from sales to research, people and places and things. Designing the right model can open the door to apples-and-orange comparisons, just as it can make them impossible.

    For a look into how we use customer data models, product data models, content models, and knowledge architecture to create a framework for unified commerce download our whitepaper: Attribute-Driven Framework for Unified Commerce

    Recent Posts

    [RECORDED] Product Data: Insights for Success - How AI is Automating Product Data Programs

    Artificial Intelligence is changing the way businesses interact with their customers. From hyper-personalized experiences to chatbots built on Large Language Models, AI is driving new investment in digital experiences. That same AI and LLM can also be used to automate your product data program. From data onboarding and validation to generating descriptions and validating images, AI can help generate content faster and at a higher quality level to improve product findability, search, and conversion rates. In our second webinar in the Product Data Mastery series, we’re speaking with Madhu Konety from IceCream Labs to show exactly how AI and product data can work together for your business.

    AI’s Value for Product Data Programs

    By Dan O'Connor, Director of Product Data, Earley Information Science

    The Critical Role of Content Architecture in Generative AI

    What is Generative AI? Generative AI has caught fire in the industry – almost every tech vendor has a ChatGPT-like offering (or claims to have one). They are claiming to use the same technology – a large language model (LLM) (actually there are many Large Language Models both open source and proprietary fine-tuned for various industries and purposes) to access and organize content knowledge of the enterprise. As with previous new technologies, LLMs are getting hyped. But what is generative AI?