Growth Series BLOG

Its a Premium BLOG template and it contains Instagram Feed, Twitter Feed, Subscription Form, Blog Search, Image CTA, Topic filter and Recent Post.

All Posts

Field Service Collaboration – Closing the Loop

Much has been done to advance the efficiency and effectiveness of field service delivery – smarter parts inventory management, intelligent routing and dispatch, improved ticketing, design for serviceability, remote service, mobile information access – the list goes on.  With all these IT investments, you’d expect we all would have maximized field service technician productivity.  

But we haven’t consistently achieved all that we can, and there is increasing pressure on productivity and profits.   Service performance time and outcomes still vary based on individual technician’s skills and knowledge.  Mobile devices and social media make it easier for techs to communicate with peers to get help and share tips, but most field service organizations don’t capture and exploit this expertise.

Collaboration happens every day informally, for some formally. But, exploiting collaboration to gain optimal productivity and quality means you can systematically:

  • Capture innovative best practices from technicians as they happen
  • Validate tips and tricks and rapidly distribute them to the field
  • Improve the flow of information between the field, R&D, engineering, and product management
  • Use best-in-class search to provide a single integrated answer to questions across all sources of information
  • Provide distributors and VARs lightweight mobile access to the same integrated answers.

We call this systematic approach Closed-Loop Collaboration (CLC).  CLC uses web-based tools and workflow for field service support, product management, and sustaining engineering to validate incoming tips and rapidly publish them to the field, often using information systems that are already in place but under-utilized.

Applied Materials (AMAT) implemented CLC using their existing SharePoint licenses.  Technicians now collaborate in real-time through the same portal they use to search for service answers.   A single search solution enabled techs to search all best practice, service records, parts lists, BOMs, and even legacy knowledge bases. The tight integration of collaboration and search cut 50% from the time required to find service information.  It also allowed AMAT to close the loop between product managers, support personnel and engineering teams.

So what?  Closed-loop collaboration helps drive consistent quality and consistently higher levels First Time Fix and Mean Time to Repair.  Less variability means improved scheduling and reduced costs. 

It’s time to level up!   Closed-Loop Collaboration opens new opportunities to improve or outperform service levels, reduce warranty service costs, and increase profit from performance-based service agreements.  

 

 

Earley Information Science Team
Earley Information Science Team
We're passionate about enterprise data and love discussing industry knowledge, best practices, and insights. We look forward to hearing from you! Comment below to join the conversation.

Recent Posts

Designing AI Programs for Success - a 4 Part Series

Recorded - available as on demand webcast AI is plagued by inflated and unrealistic expectations due to a lack of broad understanding of this wide-ranging space by software vendors and customers. Software tools can be extremely powerful, however the services, infrastructure, data quality, architecture, talent and methodologies to fully deploy in the enterprise are frequently lacking. This four-part series by Earley Information Science and Pandata will explore a number of issues that continue to afflict AI projects and reduce the likelihood of success. The sessions will provide actionable steps using proven processes to improve AI program outcomes.

The Missing Ingredient to Digital Transformation: Scaling Knowledge Communities and Processes

The holy grail of digital transformation is the seemingly conflicting goals of high levels of customer service and pressure to reduce costs. “Digital Transformation” has become an all-encompassing term – in a piece in this column about customer data platforms, I asked whether the term has lost its meaning: The phrase “digital transformation” can mean anything and everything — tools, technology, business processes, customer experience, or artificial intelligence, and every buzzword that marketers can come up with. Definitions from analysts and vendors include IT modernization and putting services online; developing new business models; taking a “digital first” approach; and creating new business processes, and customer experiences. The overarching objective of a digital transformation program is to improve end-to-end efficiencies, remove friction from information flows, and create new value streams that differentiate a company’s offerings and strengthen the customer relationship. Having assisted large global enterprises with building the data architecture, supporting processes, and governance for multiple digital transformations, in my experience, there are two broad classes of initiatives that seem to get funding and others that miss the boat in terms of time, attention, and resources.

4 Reasons B2B Manufacturers need Strong Product Data

There are many manufacturers who have started to take the leap forward in the digital space, but there are still a great number who rely solely on their distributors to manage their product data. We are going to look at 4 key reasons why its so important that manufacturers own their product and dedicate the time and resources to build it out.